In Austin Frakt’s essay The
High Costs of Not Offering Paid Sick Leave, Frakt writes about the
detrimental effects of not providing workers with paid sick leave. He mentions how many types of worker, ones in
the office to ones in restaurants, go to work despite their illness. This proves to be a problem when diseases are
spread around the workplace and possibly to customers. Frakt is a credible aithor because the end of
his essay it is said that he is a health economist and has several governmental
and academic affiliations. In addition,
he blogs at The Incidental Economist, which is a health services research
blog. Frakt’s audience in this text are
workers that have a higher position in businesses. This can include managers and owners of
businesses or corporation. This is his
audience because he is listing examples of the negative effects of unpaid sick
leave. To convince his audience that
paid sick leave is better, he mentions that “paid sick leave slows the spread
of disease” (Frakt 7) and that “each week about 1.5 million Americans without
paid sick leave go to work despite feeling ill.
At least half of the employees of restaurants and hospitals… go to work
when they have a cold or the flu” (Frakt 2).
Using these statistics make the readers feel gross and afraid of
businesses where there is no paid sick leave.
This is because readers are afraid to visit businesses with ill workers
and have a fear of contracting their disease.
By appealing to the reader’s reason, they feel that it is necessary to
offer paid leave in order to combat the spread of disease in the work place. To the reader, it only makes sense to do
that. Frakt’s essay is very relevant to
news now because just recently Chipotle had E Coli spread from its food to its
customers. The High Costs of Not Offering Paid Sick Leave convinces readers to
offer paid leave to their workers and not risk the spread of disease.
No comments:
Post a Comment